Mark, thanks for the offer, I'd like to take you up on it. I tried contacting your e-mail with no luck. Please e-mail me with your correct address.

Joe.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Discussion Lists wrote:
Hi Joe,
I have been able to set up a Squid proxy that forces users to
authenticate to it using Samba and Winbind.  With a few ACL's I can
restrict who can, and cannot access the Internet.  This also shows up on
the access.log as "domain\username."  If you need more details, email me
directly, and I will be happy to help in any way I can.  BTW, this isn't
for transparent mode, although (at least in a windows environment) you
don't need it.

Thanks,
Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Kraft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [squid-users] Getting username into squid access.log



I've read so much Squid documentation that my head is spinning now. I just want to clear up one point before I expend any more brain bytes.


If I set up squid to work transparently, ala FAQ 17.1 does than mean that there is absolutely NO WAY I will ever be able to get squid to figure out who is logged in at the machine that made the request? And thus, no usernames in the access.log?

I just want to make sure that this is the behavior referenced in the discussions about proxy-auth. So I can control access by the IP address of the machine, but not by user. Squid is not allowed by the RFC to ask anything back to the requesting machine, because the requester is not expecting squid to be there in the middle. Is this correct so far?

So the least intrusive way to make this work, and to have the names to to not use squid in a transparent mode and use the automatic configuration script from FAQ 5.2?

Thanks,
Joe.







Reply via email to