> > Elsen Marc wrote: > > > For stable6 make sure you are adequately patched if the > > ufs store type is being used as Hendrik suggested : > > > > > http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2.5.STA BLE6-ufs_no_valid_dir > > How may I check wheter or not I'm in need of that patch?
That's a bit circlonized reasoning in the sense that initially you reported a possible problem, concerning a no caching situation for all objects. For 2.5.stable6 this was a possible cause, to the idea is : 'take the patch' for that version and if that problem is seen. Then test again. > > > Access the object from 2 different browsers on 2 different hosts. > > In the second attempt , SQUID should 'deliver' a TCP_HIT > ,for this object. > > This is what I get from my 2.5stable1 proxy from 2 different clients: > > 1096536941.122 214 10.167.211.11 TCP_MISS/200 491 GET > http://www.nu.nl/img/balkje.gif boniforti > PARENT_HIT/proxy.reteunitaria.piemonte.it image/gif > 1096536950.325 396 10.167.211.11 TCP_MISS/304 418 GET > http://www.nu.nl/img/balkje.gif boniforti >... Make sure that you are not using browser refresh/reload during this tests, otherwise if-modified-since is induced and you get that behavior. Make sure also that your system clock is 'adequately synced to the Internet' (UTC synced, irrespective of Timezone). M.
