On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:48:39 +0200 (CEST), Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Jim Nachlin wrote: > > >> Squid already balances the load on multiple drives. > > > > How so? Can you explain this? > > If using either the diskd or aufs cache_dir type Squid automatically > selects the correct drive according to it's current load and in addition > issues multiple concurrent I/O requests (with diskd one I/O request per > cache_dir, with aufs a number of I/O requests in paralell to the number > of I/O threads) >
like I have two drives with mount points as /cacheA --------> SCSI /cacheB --------> SCSI and I want to use them separately, What you suggest would be better way to utlize these two SCSI's,, as currently a cache already setup in this manner is creating problem with RAID(?). and I have to check it at regular times manually for the squid program to work properly. mostly getting error's like clientReadRequest: FD 134 Invalid Request clientReadRequest: FD 188 Invalid Request clientReadRequest: FD 84 Invalid Request clientReadRequest: FD 80 Invalid Request clientReadRequest: FD 39 Invalid Request and Config 'request_header_max_size'= 10240 bytes. Request header is too large (11680 bytes) Config 'request_header_max_size'= 10240 bytes. Request header is too large (11680 bytes) Config 'request_header_max_size'= 10240 bytes. Request header is too large (11680 bytes) some times a WARNING : Your Cache is out of File descriptors and squid stops accepting connections. any Idea. > Regards > Henrik > -- Nasir Mahmood Systems + Network Admin. Asia Net.
