Hello Henrik,
Thanks again.
>> Is there anyone benchmarked squid+epoll() on polygraph? How may I expect requests
>> satisfaction limit on Linux host
>> 2.6.5-1.358 #1 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux platform?
>
> There has not been any benchmark on Squid-3 + epoll in a long time. The performance
> of this is not known.
How many requests being generated by squid + poll() / squid + select() on 32 bit
hardwares?
Is squid dev team maintaining reports for this? It is good to have for comparision
report.
> The Squid developers is currently focused on first getting Squid-3 reasonably stable
> and correct before looking at performance.
Just curious, when will be squid-3.0 stable released?
>> During polygraph testing, I am getting errors as,
>> 004.03| ./Xaction.cc:79: error: 1/1 (267) unsupported HTTP status code
>> 004.03| ./Xaction.cc:79: error: 2/2 (267) unsupported HTTP status code
>
> Could be many things.
>
> I would recommend starting with a Squid-2.5 to verify that you have the Polygraph
> setup correct. This should run without any
> errors except the expected ones..
>
> Then try out Squid-3.
epoll() support will be having on squid-3.0.
I am tasked to check, how many requests squid + epoll() are supporting.
Regards
-Muthukumar
---
=============== It is a "Virus Free Mail" ===============
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.786 / Virus Database: 532 - Release Date: 10/29/2004
