I am feverishly looking for the link, but I read a fabulous article on the 'Net that compared heap replacement algorithms and caching filesystems. It was very involved and gave lots of benchmark data. Anyone out there on the list got a link to it?
I would think that your hit/miss ratio and heap replacement is going to have a great deal more effect upon peformance than switching from ufs to aufs on a single platter. That said, I still consider myself a novice at using Squid. > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 10:42 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [squid-users] "aufs" vs "ufs" > > On a Squid cache with a single IDE drive under heavy load > will switching from "ufs" to "aufs" improve performance? If > so about how much? > > Matt > > > >
