On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 03:10, Chris Robertson wrote: > For my own experience with Squid benchmarking, I used polygraph.
That was the program I was seeing on the net. The squid box does not even have GCC installed! > I could > not get it to compile on RedHat FC1, so I imaged a couple of boxes with > RedHat 9. So, it will compile on RH9? Do you have a spec file?? hehe.. > > I was just looking for a simple load test (I was trouble shooting a CPU > usage issue), so I used the conf file from > http://www.squid-cache.org/Benchmarking/Surrogate07/. Thanks for tips > There's no better benchmark than real users. I understand, but better not to risk it not_being_able to withstand the grunt. Do you have any experience with load_balance?? > > Chris > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ow Mun Heng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 12:59 AM > To: Squid-List > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Proxy Benchmarks > > > Does anyone has any insight to this? Or nobody actually does > benchmarks?? > > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 15:36, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > > Hi, > > > > How can One benchmark a squid proxy server? I know about > > web-polygraph/measurement-factory but the instructions are long and I've > > yet to really dive into it. > > > > Besides, I can't find a RPM (for FC2) for me to use, The Squid Box does > > not have a compiler and thus I've not idea how to get to compile. -- Ow Mun Heng Gentoo/Linux on D600 1.4Ghz Neuromancer 11:00:31 up 1:38, 6 users, 1.06, 0.75, 0.69
