Andrew Sawyers wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:14 PM
To: Andrew Sawyers
Cc: 'Henrik Nordstrom'; 'Askar'; 'Squid Users'
Subject: RE: [squid-users] LVS/TUN or LVS/DR
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Andrew Sawyers wrote:
Any particular reason why you're after DR mode? I have several squids
load
balanced in masq mode and we're able to handle more traffic then most
sites
can aspire too - with basically 0 load on the LVS server.
If you do interception then LVS must not NAT the destination IP of the
connections, or else Squid has no way of figuring out what the original
destination was on HTTP/1.0 requests without Host header.
Excellent, thanks - that solves that. :)
Regards
Henrik
Andrew
Thank you all for your time and patience that clear the concept of LVS
to me, I will come back with my queries regarding LVS if we got problem
during actaul migration to LVS.
Regards
