On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Thien Vu wrote:
I'll take a look at it. I think it was to keep the format simpler because the majority of the acls are url_regexes. But I don't think this is the problem.
Most ofthen the situation should be the reverse, with url_regex being the minority only used when none of all the other acl types is suitable.
I haven't looked at how the ACLs are evaluated and if re-ordering them would help. Is this a worthwhile idea?
Only if you find that ACL processing is the bottleneck.
Regards Henrik
