I did play around with that squidGuard -C all command before.  I ran into an
issue where it would finish and shutdown all the squidGuard processes when it
completed, or so I was led to believe in the log.  I'm sure it was some odd
timing issue where I had multiple processes starting before it actually
completed.  

How does one schedule that?  The -C all command, do you run that before squid
starts as a differeint init script?  Also, if you have them prebuilt, how do
you 'rebuild' them again and not take down all the squidGuard proccesses?

--
Dave Mullen

"He who would sacrafice liberty for safety deserves neither liberty nor
safety." -Benjamin Franklin

---------- Original Message -----------
From: "Brian Gregory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dave Mullen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 22:57:11 +0100
Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid -> squidGuard: Redirect_children best practice?

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Dave Mullen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 8:32 PM
> Subject: [squid-users] squid -> squidGuard: Redirect_children best practice?
> 
> > Hey folks,
> > 
> > I'm finding people with different opinions talking about the 
> > redirect_children
> > option from within squid.
> > 
> > One is to set it to something like 5, so that you have plenty of ability to
> > answer ( like apache? ) and the second is to limit squidGuard children to 
> > have
> > an equal amount of processes as CPU's in the box.
> > 
> > I've got a company with ~500 employees that this will be blocking with a
> > fairly large blacklist.  My big concern to this is time from post to proxy. 
> > With multiple processes starting it seems to dramatically build the time up 
> > it
> > needs to get to full start.
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> Are you "pre-compiling" your domainlists and urllists into *.db 
> files by doing:
> 
> squidGuard -C all
> 
> ??
> 
> If not that will greatly speed up the start-up time when there are 
> many squidguard processes starting up.
> 
> How are you blocking with https:// URLs??
> 
> I find blocked https:// URLs just cause a messy can't access 
> http:443 message when they are blocked. Have you found any way to 
> tidy that up??
> 
> --
> 
> Brian Gregory.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Computer Room Volunteer.
> Therapy Centre.
> Prospect Park Hospital.
------- End of Original Message -------

Reply via email to