On fre, 2007-09-21 at 19:20 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> send in plain text only.  No idea why it came up with all that HTML.  Forgive 
> me if it happens again.  I sent the following:

Looks better..

> The config which I hope will work follows.  It seems no one is using the 
> bandwidth right now (Friday, I guess) and have late results which are 
> positive from someone in the "fast" pool.  So, does the following acl and 
> delay pool definitions look OK??  (Thanks in advance; Kevin):
> 
> 
> acl fast src 192.168.3.1-192.168.3.79/255.255.255.0
> acl medium src 192.168.3.80-192.168.3.120/255.255.255.0
> acl slow src 192.168.3.200-192.168.3.250/255.255.255.0

Drop the netmasks from those. Not doing what you want. (see output of
"squid -k parse")

Other than that is looks fine.

Regards
Henrik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to