> * what again was the reason you absolutely, positively have to use the 
> external helper?

the reason is my personal security policy/attitude:

on my router-box there should`n listen anything to the outside, i.e. listen to 
packets from an insecure lan - regardless of firewall settings which may apply 
or not.

if squid listens to the outside and can receive udp packets on that port, there 
may be a chance to exploit this if there is some bug within squid.

ok, maybe this is a little bit paranoid, but when it comes to network security, 
only a closed socket is a good socket - especially if it can be avoided.

regards
roland



> 
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > You can compile with --disable-internal-dns. That builds a fast external 
> > > helper that calls gethostbyname() for squid and passes the results back 
> > > without blocking other requests.
> > 
> > fantastic ! i recompiled with that option and afterwards the open port is 
> > gone automatically 
> > without touching the .conf and now being "replaced" by 5 dnshelper 
> > processes. i assume this 
> > won`t probably perform as good as before, but that doesn`t matter for me.
> 
> Just a few notes:
> 
> * its slow compared to internal dns;
> * it may use your nsswitch config if you've got a hosts database in something 
> other than
>   DNS (people used to stick em in NIS, for example, which I believe is the 
> kind of
>   thing the dnshelper stuff is still around for;)
> * what again was the reason you absolutely, positively have to use the 
> external helper?
> * finally, a DNS resolver like bind will cache just as well as using 
> something like
>   nscd with local get*host*() type calls.
> 
> 
> 
> adrian
> 
> -- 
> - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support 
> -
> - $25/pm entry-level bandwidth-capped VPSes available in WA -
> 


_______________________________________________________________________
Jetzt neu! Schützen Sie Ihren PC mit McAfee und WEB.DE. 3 Monate
kostenlos testen. http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/startseite/?mc=022220

Reply via email to