--- On Wed, 8/11/10, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [squid-users] how much traffic can squid handle? > To: "Drunkard Zhang" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Stand H" <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, August 11, 2010, 4:54 PM > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:09 AM, > Drunkard Zhang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > 2010/8/11 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <[email protected]>: > >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Drunkard Zhang > <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> 2010/8/11 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <[email protected]>: > >>>> Hi! > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Stand H > <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> --- On Mon, 8/9/10, Jose Ildefonso > Camargo Tolosa <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> From: Jose Ildefonso Camargo > Tolosa <[email protected]> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] how > much traffic can squid handle? > >>>>>> To: "Drunkard Zhang" <[email protected]> > >>>>>> Cc: "Stand H" <[email protected]>, > [email protected] > >>>>>> Date: Monday, August 9, 2010, 6:26 > PM > >>>>>> Hi! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:18 PM, > Drunkard Zhang <[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > BTW, may bonding of multiple > NICs helps on too many > >>>>>> interrupts. > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Or maybe just a good NIC, or a > GOOD NIC + bonding :) > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Can you recommend a good NIC? > >>>> > >>>> Most Intel have behaved really well with > me. As for Broadcom: bad > >>>> luck, I had to disable most of the > "hardware assistance", and thus: > >>>> add more load to the server, I'm currently > on a "avoid Broadcom" > >>>> policy, but that could change in the > future (I'll try them again > >>>> sometime). > >>>> > >>> I got bottle on forcedeth shipped with nVidia > MCP55 chipset, not got > >>> problem on Intel e1000e yet, but CPU usage on > Intel cores balanced > >>> badly. On the other hand CPU time usage on AMD > Opteron cores balanced > >>> very good with same configuration, so confuse > about this. > >>> > >> > >> Yeah, e1000 have worked very well for me. > >> > >> Ok, so, you saw that CPU usage on Intel tends to > be "inclined" to one > >> of the cores? and on AMD it gets more "balanced"? > >> > >> Also, are talking about network related load here? > or just about any > >> processes running on Intel multi-core and AMD > multicore. > >> > > With same multi-squid-instance configuration, same > Linux distro, and > > different hardware, AMD Opteron gets more balanced CPU > usage, while on > > Intel Xeon just one CPU core running out, others still > too idle, about > > 5%-15%. When that core runs out, simple TCP SYN check > on service > > failed occasional. > > > > I'm still trying to get this problem resolved...:-( > Now I'm trying > > linux-2.6.35 kernel :-). > > > > So, the only logical conclusion is: AMD rules! :) (I > actually like > AMD, but I have never faced this kind of problem with Xeon, > or maybe > I'm just not paying attention, will make a few test myself, > and see > how it ends). > > Thanks for your answer! > Hi guys, Since you're talking about multi instances, let me ask you guys a bit more. Currently I'm doing the redirection with wccpv2. squid and router is using a gre tunnel. when we have two squids running, do we need two gre tunnels for each squid? Thank you. Regards, Stand
