On 28/01/11 07:17, Ming Fu wrote:
Hi Amos,

Thanks for the insight.
Do you remember the bug number? I want to understand the issue especially when 
unencrypted traffic can be sent.

Ming


It is a bit twisted but involved with this design flaw bug:
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2117

Henriks comment #3 and #4 covers the problem.

In effect Squid handles the CONNECT as a special case whether tunnelling or bumping. The results is that for a bump the re-CONNECT is done for the internal request, not a reversion to the original CONNECT. So any special headers on that first CONNECT may be lost by the bump.

Amos
--
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.10
  Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.4

Reply via email to