hello, no, this is not the problem, it was a typo, I checked in my file and it are with -, ie to round-robin . 2011/5/2 Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz>: > On Mon, 2 May 2011 18:07:53 -0300, igor rocha wrote: >> >> See, I'm configuring my squid.conf intending it to run in mesh: >> >> cache_peer 192.168.15.200 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin >> cache_peer 192.168.15.201 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin >> cache_peer 192.168.15.202 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin >> cache_peer 192.168.15.203 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin >> >> My scenario is that there are four nodes, a front-end and the other >> nodes. As it is configured, when sent to the node IP , he accumulates >> more bytes than the other three nodes. I wonder whether we can make an >> ideal balancing ? If yes, how to do it? > > You are missing a "-" in the option name "round-robin". If Squid is ignoring > them that would drop you back to the default first-available logics which > acts like you describe.
hello, no, this is not the problem, i erred in the hour of the copy, I checked in my file and it are with -, ie to round-robin . > > Amos > >
