Il 09/04/2013 19:33, Mr Dash Four ha scritto: > [snip] >if the maximum_object_size_in_memory is reduced, > then I suppose squid's memory footprint will have to go down too, which > makes the cache_mem option a bit useless.
>I think will just store more objects in RAM. < Agreed. But it should also depend upon # reply_body_max_size 0 #read_ahead_gap Setting reply_body_max_size 100 MB should create some safety net. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/high-memory-usage-squid-3-2-0-tp4659422p4659441.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
