On Monday 13 May 2013 02:04:16 babajaga wrote: > Good idea. > It should not be too complicated to modify "storeUfsWrite"/"storeUfsRead" > for example to include some type of compression. > However, question is, how effective it would be, as there are many graphic > file types, not easily compressable. So it would result in a lot of wasted > CPU cycles. > > A simpler solution might be the usage of a compressing proxy on top of > squid. So squid will cache compressed files in all FS available, without any > patches. > > > > --
Why? It'll just cost CPU usage. storage is cheap nowadays anyways. you can just buy larger capacity disks.
