On 26/07/2014 11:44 a.m., Makson wrote: > Thanks for your reminder, i think the HTML RAW tag caused the problem, send > the log again. > > Some records found in access.log in server b, > > 1406185920.441 1282 172.17.210.5 TCP_MISS/200 814 GET > https://serverb.domain:9443/ccm/service/com.ibm.team.scm.common.IVersionedContentService/content/com.ibm.team.filesystem/FileItem/_houAAK2yEeOvOJ84krOqLg/_EPGIsq20EeOEJLtkkn17bg/h2LjUv8WJVDwJ3rcbA6_u3fNuJylQ0sQlSZdRL_IMkA > - FIRSTUP_PARENT/172.17.96.148 application/octet-stream > 1406185921.151 46349 172.17.210.5 TCP_MISS/200 219202 GET > https://serverb.domain:9443/ccm/service/com.ibm.team.scm.common.IVersionedContentService/content/com.ibm.team.filesystem/FileItem/_hpCwIK2yEeOvOJ84krOqLg/_EN-HVK20EeOEJLtkkn17bg/rnslrsXloPXpudCIXRFjShexoc97mr7-2RxWPs7pVnI > - FIRSTUP_PARENT/172.17.96.148 application/octet-stream > > > All records found in access.log in server a, > > 1406185543.094 0 172.17.192.145 UDP_MISS/000 124 ICP_QUERY > https://serverb.domain:9443/ccm/authenticated/identity?redirectPath=%2Fccm%2Fjauth-issue-token > - HIER_NONE/- - > 1406185544.871 0 172.17.192.145 UDP_MISS/000 79 ICP_QUERY > https://serverb.domain:9443/ccm/auth/authrequired - HIER_NONE/- - > 1406185565.202 0 172.17.192.145 UDP_MISS/000 124 ICP_QUERY > https://serverb.domain:9443/ccm/authenticated/identity?redirectPath=%2Fccm%2Fjauth-issue-token > - HIER_NONE/- - > 1406185566.732 0 172.17.192.145 UDP_MISS/000 79 ICP_QUERY > https://serverb.domain:9443/ccm/auth/authrequired - HIER_NONE/- - > 1406185615.090 0 172.17.192.145 UDP_MISS/000 124 ICP_QUERY > https://serverb.domain:9443/ccm/authenticated/identity?redirectPath=%2Fccm%2Fjauth-issue-token > - HIER_NONE/- - >
Showing that server B is in fact qeuerying server A for the objects. But it would seem that server A did not have them cached. It may be that these responses use Vary: header. ICP does not handle that type of response properly. You may get better behaviour using HTCP instead of ICP between the siblings. I also note that you have 40GB of RAM allocated to each of these Squid instances. Do you actually have over 100GB of RAM on those machines (*excluding* swap space)? Amos
