Isn't the problem here really the next line, that says
         bash: 1017610183.326: command not found
and not the 503 from the server?

Wade - it looks like you're trying to execute a line from a log file with
bash - the log files start with a date expressed in seconds since 1 Jan
1970, so this date is really Mon Apr  1 09:29:43 2002.  Look around your
scripts for an extra set of back-ticks.  For example
        `cat logfile`
would take the contents of logfile and attempt to run it (like a dos batch
file)

G'luck.

> ----------
> From:         Robert Collins[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent:         Monday, 1 April 2002 16:47
> To:   Wade Carroll; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      RE: understanding filtering
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wade Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:14 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: understanding filtering
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks for the reply, however, when i bypass the proxy i have 
> > no problem accessing the web page.
> 
> 10.5.4 503 Service Unavailable
> 
>    The server is currently unable to handle the request due to a
>    temporary overloading or maintenance of the server. The implication
>    is that this is a temporary condition which will be alleviated after
>    some delay. If known, the length of the delay MAY be indicated in a
>    Retry-After header. If no Retry-After is given, the client SHOULD
>    handle the response as it would for a 500 response.
        ......

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wade Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:39 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: understanding filtering
> >
> > [root@keeper squid]# 1017610183.326     20 172.17.116.100
> > TCP_MISS/503 1039 GET http://www.r3mix.net/ - NONE/- -
> > bash: 1017610183.326: command not found
> >
> > I get this message in my log file when trying to access the
> www.r3mix.net site.  It is NOT listed in any url, domain, or expression
> list for porn or ads (what I'm blocking).  I'm passing 'all'.  Why would
> it be blocked?
> 
> Wade
> 

Reply via email to