Hello Scott,

I don't know if there is a problem with the versions you mentionned, but
what I know is, you have to add a "redirect" tag  for squidGuard to block.
SquidGuard does not really block, it redirects : it can just substitute an
URL with another. So you have to specify which URL will be returned in case
a site is blocked. 

The config file you post does not contain any URL redirection. Just try to
change you acl with something like :

acl {
     default {
         pass !custom all
           redirect http://www.google.com
     }
 }

And see what appens.

HTH,
Rémi

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Scott Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Envoyé : mercredi 20 septembre 2006 23:57
> À : [email protected]
> Objet : simple config, still no luck
> 
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Trying to get a simple, super-basic example config together for 
> squidGuard 1.2.0 with Berkeley DB 4.1.25 but no luck.
> 
> My squidGuard config:
> 
> dbhome /var/lib/squidguard/db
> logdir /var/log/squid
> dest custom {
>           domainlist custom/domains
>           urllist    custom/urls
>           log blocked.log
> }
> acl {
>      default {
>          pass !custom all
>      }
> }
> 
> My /var/lib/squidguard/db/custom/domains file:
> 
> hotmail.com
> 
> /var/lib/squidguard/db/custom/urls is empty.  My test command 
> and results:
> 
> echo "http://www.hotmail.com/ 192.168.1.2/- - GET" | 
> /usr/bin/squidGuard -c /etc/squid/squidGuard.conf -d
> 2006-09-20 17:50:03 [10514] init domainlist 
> /var/lib/squidguard/db/custom/domains
> 2006-09-20 17:50:03 [10514] init urllist 
> /var/lib/squidguard/db/custom/urls
> 2006-09-20 17:50:03 [10514] urllist empty, removed from 
> memory 2006-09-20 17:50:03 [10514] squidGuard 1.2.0 started 
> (1158789003.479) 2006-09-20 17:50:03 [10514] squidGuard ready 
> for requests (1158789003.480)
> 
> 2006-09-20 17:50:03 [10514] squidGuard stopped (1158789003.480)
> 
> 
> I'm thinking that this couldn't be any simpler, yet it doesn't 
> work.  I get the blank line indicating success, no blocking.  What in 
> the world could I possibly be missing here?  It has to be 
> something obvious...
> 
> Many thanks for any help,
> --Scott!
> 

Reply via email to