Chris Hilts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 11 14, 02 at 16:58: 
> > If you actually use SM to read the SM list, you get the "REPLY TO LIST"
> > button and then you send only 1 response. Other mailers (mutt, Evo, etc)
> > have similar options. Too many people do a REPLY ALL, and don't trim the
> > list of addresses they are replying to.
> 
> I'm in the habit of using rely all, because most of the lists I'm on get
> lots of queries from people who aren't on the list. If we're going to get
> anal about email etiquitte, I'd much rather rant about people who quote
> and quote and quote and never trim a thing, just to say "Yeah, that's a
> good idea" or "me too".

I wouldn't call my response "anal", since we don't complain each time it happens.
Not like some lists, I'm on.

> Plus if someone does use reply all to one of my posts, I know I've been
> responded to. I may not get around to reading the stuff in my list folders
> until later, and this lets me prioritize.

I'm different; I don't really see a need to double the bandwidth, and then
make me delete the 2nd (sometimes more) copy that arrives as private email.
To my way of thinking, and I know not everyone agrees, if you/I ask a
question on a list, you/I answer on the list. I don't need a 2nd copy in
private email.

Private, off list replies, are certainly not the norm, not by a very large
percentage, in my experience.

-- 
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
Member, LEAF Project <http://leaf.sourceforge.net>    AIM: MikeLeone
Public Key - <http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc>
Registered Linux user# 201348

Attachment: msg00441/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to