> >> > Can SM runs w/o in non-frame mode?
> >> >
> >> > -rkl
> >> >
> >>
> >> It is in the works, a plugin was created but required a few core
hacks
> > to
> >> get done.  I have since rewritten the plugin and have the code to
> > submit
> >> to CVS to get it to work, but I have been busy with other things
> > lately.
> >> I'll put this on the top of my list and get this pushed out
> > immediately!
> >
> > What was the conclusion we came to about making the patch/plugin
> > available for people who want to use it without waiting for 1.5 to
be
> > released?
> >
> >   - Paul
> >
> 
>   I believe we can to the conclusion that it would be best if it was
put
> in 1.5 and a patch(s) released for 1.4 to be included with the plugin.

The original author pretty much had it ready to go, no?  Should we get
him back on it and get something released?

> I'm currently rewriting part of it to work with the latest devel,
since a
> few minor things have changed since the last time I worked on it.
> 
> The only other question we didn't completely come to a conclusion with
is
> whether this should fully be a core thing, or should we have part of
it as
> a plugin?  If it was core, it would cut cut down greatly on the
changes
> needing to be made to the core, otherwise we are making alot of
changes
> (mainly just hook additions) just to support a plugin.
> 
> I've also been thinking of a better way to do it since the plugin
actually
> doesn't use the code for left_main that we currently use (uses it
own),
> and would have to be updated everytime a bug is fixed in there.

That's definitely a bad thing.  But as to creating a ton of new hooks
just to support this functionality, I say thumbs down, especially since
there seems to be consensus that this can be a core functionality.

Also, that thread about the new hooks for internal links... it kinda
died, but can I assume that my suggestion of removing those hooks and
just bringing msg_flags in as a core feature instead of as a plugin is
acceptable?  I don't want to step on your toes, but I'd like to just
cross this off the list, so I am willing to make the changes if need be.

Cheers,

  Paul



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Reply via email to