Let's make it clear. I, personally, have not tried it. But a user had called and said that there were some problems retrieving some messages. Without alarming the user, I had asked what he was doing and he explained that he was not setting up any connection via imap or pop. he just gives it the url, username and password as part of the outlook. And also, stated, he can connect to yahoo and hotmail via the url method no problem.
I'll try to get more inof on this matter to pass it on. It sounds like no-one has heard of this yet huh? Or maybe, it's not a big deal. thanks, -rkl > Hello Rkl, > On Tuesday, October 07, 2003, rkl wrote... > >> Yes it's true of the statements about imap, sm and outlok has no >> relavencies. > >> However, some users are using the connection to mailserver by using a >> hook >> in the outlook to connect to something other tahn imap/pop directly. >> Outlook has an option to connect with a url such as yahoo, hotmail and, >> in >> our case, sm through an http url calls. Thus, they are receiving and >> sending messages from outlook with the sm being the proxy. This is what >> I >> meant by wrapper. > >> outlook <-squirrelmail->imap > >> any help would be good. > > Well... then I'd love it if you could send details on exactly how they > are doing that, because SM doesn't have ANY code that allows for them > to do that. So although Outlook Express supports connecting to a URL, > SquirrelMail doesn't support Outlook connecting to it. > > -- > Jonathan Angliss > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > ----------------------------------------- eMail solutions by http://www.swanmail.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
