James Grubic  said:
> Look what I found:
>
> A blurb on the SquirrelMail site mentions that SquirrelMail's parser as
> of v1.3 isn't RFC compliant. I suppose this is up for interpretation and
> dispute.
>
> Here's the link:
>
> http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/en_US/EIMsUIDproblem
>

That issue is fixed by me in SM 1.4.1 if I'm correct. The order of the
returned FETCH arguments doesn't matter anymore.

> Anyway, I am glad that I found this information now rather than NEVER. I
> turned off UID support and now everything seems to appear fine in the
> inbox. I am not sure if this is a short-term fix or if there are other
> issues that need to be addressed in future SquirrelMail versions. (I
> know that EIMS is not officially supported by SM, but I sincerely hope
> in the future that it will be since it is recommended by many EIMS users.)
>

SquirrelMail supports IMAP 4 rev 1 servers. EIMS is such server and we
should support it. I didn't had the time to look at your issue again but I
will do that soon.

> Now hopefully I won't have to pester the SquirrelMail developers any
> more.   :)
>

You don't pester us :). We want a imap4 compliant client and so do you so
we  want the same.

Thnx to the test account you gave me I already know what's going on. Next
step is to fix it permanently :)

Regards,

Marc Groot Koerkamp.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Reply via email to