> "Fredrik Jervfors" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> 
>>> it seems to slow down once the inbox has alot of messages, for example
>>> 5K messages.
>>> 
> 
>> try activating server side sorting. It might speed things up.
>> 
>> config/conf.pl 4.  General Options
>> 11. Allow server-side sorting   : true
>> 
> 
> I ran into this same issue last night after deploying. A lot of our
> users read via POP (instead of IMAP) and leave the mail on the server.
> 
> The FAQ under SquirrelMailPerformance suggests that if your
> server supports SORT and Threading, you can really improve performance.
> What it doesn't say is that you have to turn these on in
> the ./configure program.  In addition to server sorting, I turned on server
> threading.
> 
> My user with 4000 messages in INBOX used to take 2 minutes to display
> the message list. Now it takes 4 seconds at most.  Happy users. Happy
> sysadm. :-)
> 
> I just updated this section of the FAQ to provide a few more details
> on how to check your IMAP server and the two sorting features I enabled.

You have to be sure that your server supports all sort/thread commands that can be 
issued by SquirrelMail. Some servers support sorting only in us-ascii charset. 
SquirrelMail can use more than 16 different charsets. If your server does not support 
some charset used by user, interface will become unusable after changing sort order.

-- 
Tomas


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Reply via email to