> Sorry to be the bearer of bad news here -- I just don't think you have the > hardware to do it. For such a number of users, the end-to-end design has > to be scalable and resilient. > > John > >
John, The bottle neck I see with SM right now is that it reads all the headers etc etc of the entire mail in the INBOX when you log in. If your INBOX has 100K pieces or even 10K pieces of messages, it will be slow. SM 1.5.1 seems to fix this problem but it is not a stable release yet. If SM can work directly with DBmail, accessing DBMAIL directly instead of IMAP, it will be the fastest thing you will ever see. Robert ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
