> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:squirrelmail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier DUCROT
> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:[SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication
> 
> It should be nice if it could be kerberized. I remember, a few month
ago,
> I
> saw a part of kerberization for Horde/IMP, but I don't want to leave
SM
> !!!
> 
> So I installed apache realm and http_auth for the moment, waiting for
> Tiger
> with kerberization of HTTP ... It won't be a real kerberization of SM.
> 

I personally would rather see the coding time going to more widely
usable feature enhancements and speed improvements (like those that
we're seeing with 1.5). Why spend time and resources trying to implement
everyone's favorite authentication mechanism when it isn't really needed
except for specialty circumstances like Single Sign On (which is just a
bad bad idea IMHO).

On the flip side, you have access to the source so you can implement it
if you like. We tested SSO capability of SM by modifying redirect.php to
accept and process an encrypted username/password pair that could be
passed as part of a url. It only took about half a day with the hardest
part being finding compatible Perl and PHP encryption routines and we
don't even program for a living. It was just a proof of concept, but it
worked.

--
Marc


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: [email protected]
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Reply via email to