> Becky L. Sabino, LAN Administrator wrote:
> > Just FYI:
> >
> >
> > I installed 1.5.1 and here were the results:
> >
> >
> > 1.5.1
> > From the time I clicked login until folder list displayed  55
> > seconds From the time I clicked login until inbox messages displayed 4
> > min 44 seconds
> >
> > 1.4.3
> > From the time I clicked login until INBOX MESSAGES displayed 3
> > minutes 15 seconds From the time I clicked login until FOLDER LIST
> > displayed, 6 minutes 43 seconds.
> >
> > That is with about 18500 messages and 125-135 folders.
> >
> >

> Thnx for the info but i have a few questions:
> 1) Do you have unseen/total messages count on each folder in 1.5.1 and 1.4.3?

> 2) is the 55 seconds for the folder list display (left frame) or the
> messages list (right frame)

> 3) On which column are you sorting in 1.4.3 and 1.5.1?

> 4) Do you use plugins like the filter plugin?

> The reason for these questions are that 6 min 43 <-> 4 min 44 isn't that
> much of an improvement.
> Knowing the amount of data we fetch from the imap server the performance
> improve is a little bit low. Maybe you're imap server is a bit ineffecient
> still has to process all headers even if you fetch only one header of it.

> Marc.


        Hi Marc,

        1)  I am displaying the unseen count on the inbox but not the
        total. 

        2)  The left frame is coming up first.  The times I got today
        were 54 seconds for the left frame and 4 minutes 22 seconds
        for the right frame in 1.5.1. 

        3) In 1.4.3 I am sorting on subject and in 1.5.1 the sort is
        on subject and flags.  I was sorting on other fields
        originally (date and sender I believe).  I have noticed a big 
improvement in the amount of
        time that it takes to open up other folders.  One of my
        folders with 1500 messages is now opening in about 3 seconds. 
        The thing that I don't like about not sorting on the
        additional fields is that now the only thing showing in my
        message list is the subject.  I haven't looked into other
        settings/plugins that will display those fields without
        sorting on them.  

        4) I haven't installed any plugins in 1.5.1.  I do have some
        installed in 1.4.3 but not the filter plugin.

        Our IMAP server quite frankly sucks so it is probably a safe
        bet that the major issue is there.  I've had some
        conversations with someone else using SM with a PMDF backend
        that has similar issues.

        Thanks for your input.

        -B

> >
> >
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> My configuration:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> SM v 1.4.4
> >>> XAMPP 1.4.13
> >>> Apache 2.0.53
> >>> PHP 4.3.11
> >>> MySQL 4.1.11
> >>> eAccelerator 0.9.2a running on Fedora Core 3 hp proliant DL360 2GB RAM
> >>>  intel xeon 3.6GHz CPU
> >>>
> >>> Our IMAP server is  PMDF V6.2 running on VMS
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> SqirrelMail runs like a charm on smaller mailboxes but is v-e-r-y
> >>> slow when loading larger ones.  For example, I have about 18,500
> >>> messages in 150 folders and it takes anywhere from 3.5 - 4 minutes to
> >>> load.  I have gone through the performance tuning recommendations and
> >>> am running eAccelerator, boosted my memory_limit setting in php.ini to
> >>> 64.  I've
> >>> tried using an IMAP proxy - running it on the same server - and it
> >>> actually seemed slower.  The admin of the PMDF server tells me that
> >>> PMDF
> >>> doesn't support the SORT IMAP extension or server-side threading.  I'm
> >>>  guessing that the IMAP server is the cause of the slowness.  Does
> >>> anybody have experience tuning SM in a similar environment?  Is there
> >>> something else that I can tweak?
> >>>
> >
> >> Yes, make sure your mailbox isn't sorted or give 1.5.1 CVS a try (Be
> >> aware it's the devel branch so it can contain a few glitches but overall
> >> the current state is pretty stable. However it misses some error
> >> reporting at the moment. Also, don't mix the preference dir with the dir
> >> you use for the stable branch because sort state per mailbox is handled
> >> different and it removes the old sort related preferences used in
> >> 1.4.x.).
> >>
> >
> >> 1.5.1 CVS probably can do the job in 30 seconds. If you test it, please
> >>  tell us how much faster it is.
> >
> >> Of course you can also switch to an imap server with the imap SORT
> >> extension. UW, Courier, Cyrus-IMAP and dovecot (and the servers I
> >> forgot) all supports the SORT extension.
> >
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >
> >> Marc Groot Koerkamp.
> >>
> >




        -Becky

*****************************************************************
* Becky L. Sabino, LPIC-1                                       *
* ACCESS                    "advancing education technologies"  *        
* LAN Administrator                                             *
* 425 W. Main St.            E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]     *
* P.O. Box 248               Phone  : (330) 270-7475            *
* Canfield, OH 44406         FAX    : (330) 702-1216            *
*                                                               *
*                                                               *
*   If you can read this, thank a teacher                       *
*          ...and, since it's in English, thank a soldier !!    *
*****************************************************************


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: [email protected]
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Reply via email to