On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Iacopo Benesperi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Lesniewski ha scritto:
>
> > SquirelMail can use an IMAP server that is not local.
>
> Thanks for the tip, I've installed it (and the right way!).
>
>
> > grep the source code. Also see the function sqm_baseuri(). It's the
> > SM base URI as the name suggests.
>
> I haven't done this, but I logged in the normal way and I've checked the
> base_uri SM writes down in the cookie and used it. Not so clear, but
> it'll work for the moment.
>
>
> > Very poor excuse. Spare servers are very cheap, especially at a
> > school where there are always extras to be had (server != expensive
> > non-workstation)
>
> Believe me: we don't have money to buy anything... Let's just say that
> this is the situation and it won't change.
>
> Now, back to problems: I've obtained something, but it still doesn't
> work. When I set the cookie with php-fusion (my CMS) and then go to
> webmail.php page it says that I must be logged in to see my mails, but
> if I click on the link to go to login.php page, it opens my mailbox!
login.php is not your mailbox; it will actually destroy your login
session entirely. The link is something else and only you can debug
this convoluted scenario.
> This means that it doesn't login completly but I managed to do it
> partially. Any idea on how to finish the work and make it open my
> mailbox directly?
> On the login function I've added these two lines (and the two functions
> I said in the previous message):
>
> setcookie('user', base64_encode(MD5Encrypt($user_name, 'changeme')), 0,
> '/squirrelmail/');
>
> setcookie('pass', base64_encode(MD5Encrypt($_POST['user_pass'],
> 'changeme')), 0, '/squirrelmail/');
>
> I've noticed that I should need to set also the cookie "SQMSESSID" and
> the cookie "key", but I don't know how to make them. I've tried to look
> in redirect.php but for the first one I have no idea, for the second if
grep the source code. I think I already told you it's in functions/global.php.
> I'm right I have to import half of SM's functions (okay, I'm a little
> bit exagerating!) because one calls inside itself another one. Am I
> really right? Pls. say no!
That's what include() and require() are for.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
-----
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines
List address: [email protected]
List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options):
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
