On 16-Nov-2009, at 03:01, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * LuKreme <[email protected]>:
>> On Nov 12, 2009, at 1:50, Ralf Hildebrandt  
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hm, which IMAP server is that?
>> 
>> Courier-imapd-ssl running on pretty old hardware.
> 
> Yes, that's very slow, since it does no header caching (unlike dovecot)

I think when I setup this server in 2001 I made the right choice on courier.

I am thinking that when I get the new hardware in (this week?) I am going to go 
with dovecot even though it means learning a whole new setup process. Certainly 
the authentication module seems to be a lot better (that is, easier to grok) 
and the IMAP server seems to be more mature.

I post this mostly, I suppose, as fair warning of the numerous stupid questions 
I may be asking in the coming week, bit hear and over on postfix-users. :)

Is there an ETA on 1.5 moving into Stable? Or is it good enough for pretty 
light use (I really only have a dozen or so users that use webmail at all 
anymore as anything other than a very occasional 'Ooops, I'm not at my machine 
right now, let me check this email on [PUBLIC/BORROWED MACHINE] real quick.'). 
I'm currently running 1.4.19_1

-- 
'Dojo! What is Rule One?'
Even the cowering challenger mumbled along to the chorus:
'Do not act incautiously when confronting little bald wrinkly smiling men!' 
--The Thief of Time


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
-----
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines
List address: [email protected]
List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Reply via email to