No need to get like that. I can't help it that I didn't get your post by email and the only way to respond was by top posting!
Anyway, is this a place where we can discuss stuff like what I posted or what? Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone Op 26 jun. 2010 om 14:25 heeft Paul Lesniewski <p...@squirrelmail.org> het volgende geschreven: > Please do not top-post. Please reply to my message and not your > original one. Please do READ the posting guidelines that your were > asked to when you subscribed. > >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm trying to get SM1.5.2 not to use identities that were pre made but to >>> use the original to address from the original email as from address when >>> doing a reply. >>> >>> Any ideas on how to get that working? > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Patrick Bos <patrick....@zjipz.com> wrote: >> I want this functionality because I want to use 1 email address in 1 domain >> to function as a support mailbox >> to which people can send support request. >> People can send mail to email addresses based on recipients names and other >> support techies >> can still open that mail and respond with the correct from address. > > That's what multiple identities are for, or see the Custom From > plugin, which would need to be updated to work with SquirrelMail > 1.5.2. > >> This all without having to manage the poorly functioning identities. > > Multiple identities work just fine. > >> Have you ever noticed that when multiple people are logged in to 1 email >> account in sm and >> one of them adds an identity that the identity is actually not really added? >> As soon as that >> user logs out and in again to check the identities, that last added entry or >> even multiple last >> added entries is/are not there. > > You misunderstand how a web application works. Information kept in > the user (PHP) session cannot be shared across multiple sessions. Web > applications are generally not intended to work as you are assuming. > You're better off implementing shared IMAP folders in your IMAP > server. > >> So actually, I'd like a more reliable identity system (db based for >> instance) or the option I >> suggested in my first email. > > I'd like it if you checked your assumptions first before blaming our > software, which doesn't make developers feel like helping you out. > Thanks. > > -- > Paul Lesniewski > SquirrelMail Team > Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! > http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint > What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? > Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first > ----- > squirrelmail-users mailing list > Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines > List address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user > List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first ----- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
