On Aug 27, 2004, at 19:35, Bret Busby wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Bret Busby wrote:
[...]
The second thing, is that I did not see any response, that would suggest
or indicate that SQWebMail is being maintained or revised.
Could someone please advise as to whether SQWebMail is being maintained or revised?
Yes.
Also, another feature request, if SQWebMail is being maintained or revised; could we please have, with the filters, the criteria, or "Condition" options, selectable by checkboxes, rather than radio buttons, so as to allow combinations for the criteria, instead of a single criterion, or "Condition" being the limit for a filter? This would allow much more effective filtering.
Dunno.
Thank you in anticipation.
Sorry I can't say for sure if either of your ideas could happen, or even be worked on by anyone. There's only one developer on the project (Sam) and the rest of us are a mix of... people needing help... people offering help... people hoping for patches to do X, Y, or Z... people submitting patches to Sam that do A, B, or C and hoping he'll approve them into the code base... or people who are a combination of some or all of the afore.
Best bet: If you have any coding skills in C, write a patch yourself.
Next best: Pray.
(Not what you would *like* to hear, I'm sure. But at least it's an answer instead of silence. Right? :)
-jab
P.S. Certainly don't count on it from me... After all, I already have a long list of features (compiled with input from the list) which I was working on at one point and have not been able to find time (and energy) to complete. :( And which are therefore bit-rotting badly. -- But I'll file your suggestions away, in case I get some time to look into them. *shrug* Best I can offer personally.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
