Have you added the proper webmail pam settings to your pam configuration?
They are listed in the INSTALL file as I recall.
Cheers,
Tren.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- Tren Blackburn - Owner mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
= End of Time Networks http://www.theendoftime.net -
- (403) 269-2122 =
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Andy Bradford wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 22:43:54 GMT, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> > > I only want to use authpam for the time being, however, if I put it in
> > > /usr/local/share/sqwebmail/authmodulelist as the only authentication
> > > method it fails to login. On the other hand, if I put it in
> > > /usr/local/share/sqwebmail/authdaemonrc in the authmodulelist option
> > > and place authdaemon in the authmodulelist file it works. Maybe I
> > > didn't explain it very well.
> >
> > You explained exactly how it's supposed to work.
>
> So I can't authenticate without authdaemon? If that's not the case,
> any idea why it's not working then? For the time being I don't want to
> use authdaemon but just authpam. Here are the results of the authtest
> program:
>
> [root@catania authlib]# ./authtest -s webmail -m authdaemon andy sqwebmail
> Authenticated: module authdaemon
> Home directory: /home/andy
> UID/GID: 500/500
> AUTHADDR=andy
> AUTHFULLNAME=Andy Bradford
>
> [root@catania authlib]# ./authtest -s webmail -m authpam andy sqwebmail
> Authentication FAILED!
>
> The only authentication module listed in authdaemonrc is authpam... I
> have attached to the authdaemond with strace as well as using strace to
> follow authtest, but there don't seem to be any problems.
>
> Excuse my ignorance if this is not possible. :-) All the documentation
> seems to indicate otherwise---I believe it is possible. It's almost as
> if authpam is being used differently by the authdaemond.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Andy
> p.s. I could send along the strace, but I don't know know if that would
> help. I wish I had more time to debug this properly. :-)
>
>
