Sam Varshavchik writes:
> Francis P. Ling writes:
>
>> Sam Varshavchik writes:
>>
>>> Andrea Cerrito writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I'm testing SQWebmail 2.1.1 and I found a little problem: SQWebmail
>>>> allow
>>>> sending mails with no dests. Here are headers of the message in the
>>>> send
>>>> folder:
>>>>
>>>> From: "test" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Subject: test with no subject
>>>> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 09:47:14 GMT
>>>> Mime-Version: 1.0
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>>>
>>>> Is it normal or is it a little bug?
>>>
>>> "Doctor, it hurts when I do this."
>>>
>>> "Well, don't do it, then."
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sam
>>>
>>
>>
>> So Sam,
>>
>>
>> You mean that it is OK for not to put the Recipient (To, Cc, Bcc) address
>> and hit the SEND button. Then where would the mail land itself? Moon full
>> of void?
>
> It depends on the mail server. I think Qmail will bitbucket the mail.
> After all, there are no recipients to deliver the mail to, so the mail
> server's job is done. Courier will reject the mail, throwing sqwebmail
> back into compose mode. I have no idea what sendmail, postfix, or exim
> will do.
>
> If you tell sqwebmail to send a message, it will do what you tell it to
> do, plain and simple: send the message. Or at least try. If the mail
> server accepts it, the job is done. If you realized made a mistake, you
> can fish the message out of the Sent folder, and try again.
>
> --
> Sam
>
That's what I see in the log. The mail just disappear into the void. Maybe
this is normal for qmail.
Sam, is there anyway for sqwebmail to check the TO/CC/BCC field so that none
would be left empty.
Thanks.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Any opinions, explicit or implied, are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of PANSAR
-----------------------------------------------------------
