I run 1600x1280 here on IE6 and it looked just fine to me.
Cheers,
Tren.
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 01:23:45AM +0000, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> > Try a big, expensive, monitor. At least 1280x1024, a resolution of
> > 1600x1200 would be even better.
>
> Actually, I did. I run 1280x1024 at home. Looked fine under both Opera and
> Windows...
>
> > In the rare situations where fonts of a specific size must be use, font size
> > should be specified in points, not explicit pixel sizes. Both Windows and
> > X-Windows have an adjustable points-per-inch setting, to some degree, so
> > that rendered text would have roughly the same absolute size at any screen
> > resolution.
>
> We would love to have our style incorporated in to the distribution. If we
> could change the font definitions to your liking, would you be willing to
> consider the possibility of incorporating it?
>
> -Ben
>
> --
> Ben Beuchler There is no spoon.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The Matrix
>
