Brian,

I am running 5.2.1 which appears to be the latest version outside of the
'development version' 

Are you talking about the 'development version' curing the problem....

Thanx.

Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Candler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:08 PM
To: Jay Lepore
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sqwebmail] password login problem


On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 10:34:59AM -0400, Jay Lepore wrote:
> Wow, this has been a nightmare problem for me for many months. I have 
> over 100 users using sqwebmail and I always am hearing about login 
> failures.
> 
> I'll be interested in hearing if it gets resolved here.
> 
> Wish I had a solution but I just have more questions.

The solution is to use a newer version of vpopmail, which doesn't have a
nasty bug in it.

The workaround is to recompile courier/sqwebmail --without-authdaemon

> 
> Jay
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick van Vliet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [sqwebmail] password login problem
> 
> 
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:10:34 -0700, Steve Wagor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> 
> > I am using vpopmail 5.2.1 and sqwebmail 3.5.0 and I have a customer
> > that
> > has
> > problems logging in to get his mail. He goes to the login screen and

> > enters
> > his stuff and is not allowed in multiple times and then it finally
> works.
> > He
> > says it sometimes takes up to 50 tries.
> >
> > I don't have this problem coming from my workstations so I can't 
> > reproduce it.
> >
> > Anyone have a clue as to what I could do to improve his login ratio?
> >
> > Steve...
> >
> >
> 
> I had the same issue with several roaming users. Authdaemond would get
> "wonky" on them, restarting daemon would help, but not using it at all

> resolved the problem.
> .
> I think if you are using that authdaemond...try recompiling and
> --without- 
> authdaemond.
> 
> This has been somewhat common problem. Probably more info in mailList
> archives.
> 
> rick
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 





Reply via email to