Are there any Solaris 9 users on this list?
Sun 2003.11.02 15:22, "Brian Candler" wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 04:12:47PM +0100, Paul Diaconescu wrote:
> > I'm using 3.6.1. I've attached a mail. Thanks / Paul
>
> Cheers. MIME stuff looks OK at a glance.
>
> It views OK in sqwebmail under FreeBSD/i386; I get
>
> Attachment: image/gif (3K)
> Display / Download
>
> and clicking on 'Display' gives the image. So you may have uncovered a bug
> with attachment handling under Solaris.
>
> Note that the headers for the image say
>
> Content-Disposition: attachment; ...
>
> and so it's not displayed inline. Changing this to "Content-Disposition:
> inline" gives the image directly below the message as expected.
>
> Regards,
>
> Brian.
>
> >
> >
> > Sun 2003.11.02 14:25, "Brian Candler" wrote:
> > > Which version of sqwebmail have you built? There was a problem quite a long
> > > time ago with EOF markers (char/unsigned char) in Solaris, but it was fixed.
> > >
> > > If you could send yourself a message with a small picture attached, confirm
> > > that it views wrongly in sqwebmail, then take the file directly out of the
> > > Maildir, gzip it, and send it to this mailing list, we can have a look to
> > > see if there's any problem with the MIME formatting.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Brian.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 03:06:15PM +0100, Paul Diaconescu wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > After recompiling a couple of times, trying different apache version
> > > > etc. I've given up. I even tried to comment out row 1805-1825 in
> > > > folder.c so that sqwebmail displays images as normal attachments (I
> > > > don't know c). I've played with the mime.types file... It still points
> > > > to a 1 byte file.
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone have any clue on where the problem is?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for any help! / Paul
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 1, 2003, at 17:01, Paul Diaconescu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >No, it can't be none of those. I've tried sending mail from outlook,
> > > > >mail.app on mac os x and mutt on solaris. I've sent the attachment as
> > > > >inline and attachment from mutt (in the first case sqwebmail display a
> > > > >"view/download" link, in the other case a "image not found" icon -
> > > > >both point to 1 byte files). I've also tried several browsers.
> > > > >
> > > > >It has to be something with sqwebmail mime or image handling on
> > > > >Solaris. My bet is that it has something to do with the return value
> > > > >on Solaris since the file contains just "255".
> > > > >
> > > > >/ Paul D
> > > > >
> > > > >On Nov 1, 2003, at 16:35, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >>Paul Diaconescu writes:
> > > > >>>Ok, even clearer ;): attached or inline pictures within the mail
> > > > >>>(not pointing to any external source) are 1 byte files instead of
> > > > >>>the original picture. It's not a problem with the message transfer
> > > > >>>since picture attachments work fine with mutt.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>There must be a problem with the multipart/related formatting of your
> > > > >>message. Either that, or you did attach only an external link to an
> > > > >>image.
> > > > >>--
> > > > >>Sam
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
>
>
