Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > The purpose of that t_flush_flags() is documented: > > * > https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tmx.html#tmx.f.t_flush_flags > > The role was to push the flags set after t_newtran() to > transaction. If that is not happening/is not needed for what so ever > reason, needs to be sorted out in a way or another.
Yes, and that is the topic of #1490. > The behaviour can stay as it is, with or without any new parameter -- > this is going to be discussed. But again, it doesn't belong here, the > issue we discuss is with flushing the flags after t_newtrans() and > should be done in a single place. The xflags will follow whatever is > decided for t_flush_flags(), but right now xflags works as it is > expected based on docs for t_flush_flags(). > Let's discuss further on #1490 and get the two work the same in a > properly documented behaviour. OK, I'll close this issue with the note that the current semantics of xflags does not correspond to that of flags. -- Juha _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev