@henningw
Q: "Is the binding from Kamailio memory manager to library memory manager
functionality (ortp_memory_functions etc..) not needed anymore?"
A: I found as least to edge case in oRTP where it was not using the specified
memory allocation functions ...
At this point I think it will be less problematic spawn threads from one or
more dedicated processes in Kamailio, the worker processes will not interact
with the libraries directly.
This seems like a perfectly fine decision in terms of architecture and there
will be no more bugs related to shared memory ...
Thank for pinpointing the unwanted modifications to the core
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1823#issuecomment-458246409
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
[email protected]
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
