Hi,
El mié., 26 ago. 2020 20:25, Cindy Leung <[email protected]>
escribió:
> Is it possible that the branches are handled differently when they're
> added by append_branch()?
>
> append_branch("sip:[email protected];transport=tcp", "0.3");
> append_branch("sip:[email protected];transport=tcp", "0.2");
> append_branch("sip:[email protected];transport=tcp", "0.7");
> append_branch("sip:[email protected];transport=tcp", "0.5");
> append_branch("sip:[email protected];transport=tcp", "0.6");
> xlog ("=== $(branch(uri)[0]), $(branch(q)[0])\n");
> xlog ("=== $(branch(uri)[1]), $(branch(q)[1])\n");
> xlog ("=== $(branch(uri)[2]), $(branch(q)[2])\n");
> xlog ("=== $(branch(uri)[3]), $(branch(q)[3])\n");
> xlog ("=== $(branch(uri)[4]), $(branch(q)[4])\n");
> t_load_contacts();
> while (t_next_contacts()) {
> xlog ("==== $ru\n");
> }
>
>
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_load_contacts
Function t_load_contacts() **removes all branches** from the current
destination set and stores them into the XAVP whose name is configured with
the parameter contacts_avp
It doesn't matter how you're adding branches before. t_load_contacts() will
remove them.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2449#issuecomment-681135784_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
[email protected]
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
