I remember Daniel already answered similar questions, from what I remember, the
algo will redistribute the weight to a ratio of stored in 100 slots and fill
the remaining slots with the first one.
So there may be a slight offset.
What you are reporting in this issue is that the distribution it not done well
when there is more than 25 hosts ?
I find this statement a bit confusing :
"but errors were the same when dispatcher group had more than 25 and less than
25 hosts"
compare to :
"Dispatcher group must have more than 25 hosts, if equal or less than 25 than
it is Ok:"
If this is the case, it seems valuable to be able to support more than 25
hosts or at least issue a warning.
I will try to have a look hopefully soon, I found this algo is an interesting
building block and a very good option for many scenarios.
The limitations that may complicate things are sometimes introduce by code
architecture that would need too much refactoring, lets see.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2698#issuecomment-810491161
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
[email protected]
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
