Dear all Would you have any feedback about this query?
thanks a lot! David Escartín El jue, 11 feb 2021 a las 23:56, David Escartin (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Hello > > seems with t_flush_xflags() after setxflag on failure_route, it makes it > work. However i don't know if that should be the expected behaviour, since > with regular transaction flags there is no need to use t_flush_flags() > > best regards > david > > El mié, 10 feb 2021 a las 16:08, David Escartin (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > >> Dear all >> >> i think i have noticed a wrong behaviour with xflags. When they are set >> in a failure_route and a t_relay is done after that to a destination, its >> state is lost in the next on_reply route. >> This doesn't happen with regular transaction flags, and it doesn't happen >> with xflags either when xflag is set inside an onreply_route. >> We have seen it on versions 5.3 and 5.4 >> >> Could you please confirm this? >> thanks a lot >> regards >> david escartin >> >> -- >> [image: Logo] >> >> David Escartín Almudévar >> VoIP/Switch Engineer >> [email protected] >> >> *SONOC* >> C/ Josefa Amar y Borbón, 10, 4ª · 50001 Zaragoza, España >> Tlf: +34 917019888 · www.sonoc.io >> > > > -- > [image: Logo] > > David Escartín Almudévar > VoIP/Switch Engineer > [email protected] > > *SONOC* > C/ Josefa Amar y Borbón, 10, 4ª · 50001 Zaragoza, España > Tlf: +34 917019888 · www.sonoc.io > -- [image: Logo] David Escartín Almudévar VoIP/Switch Engineer [email protected] *SONOC* C/ Josefa Amar y Borbón, 10, 4ª · 50001 Zaragoza, España Tlf: +34 917019888 · www.sonoc.io
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
