Hello, I guess it was designed for string. What does it return now for int type?
Overall, for me it would be fine to extend for int, or maybe better add a new function if someone considers this one becomes confusing. Cheers, Daniel On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 2:03 PM Stefan-Cristian Mititelu < stefan-cristian.mitit...@1and1.ro> wrote: > Hello, I have a question for [1] config function. > > Can I extend it to work with INTs too? e.g. if pv not NULL and INT flag, > return 1. This would help, because one won't need to know the type of the > pvar beforehand, for using this function. > > Or is it meant to be used only with string pv only? > > [1] > https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/pv.html#pv.f.not_empty > > > Thank you, > Stefan > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe send an email to sr-dev-le...@lists.kamailio.org > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - https://www.asipto.com https://twitter.com/miconda - https://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - https://www.asipto.com/u/kat
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List To unsubscribe send an email to sr-dev-le...@lists.kamailio.org
