On Thursday 24 September 2009, Alex Hermann wrote: > Scenario 2 breaks. It should enter branch route (or send out identical > message by itself). From a usability standpoint, I would prefer that the > behavior is identical for received 503 or internal 408. And as every > failover creates a new branch, I think branch_route should be called > everytime. > > > > A quick workaround would be that on DNS based failover in case of a > > > timeout, branch route is called again. I tried to find in the source > > > the place where the decision is made whether or not to call branch > > > route on DNS failover, but got lost.
A workaround seems to be to call t_on_branch() again in the branch_route itself. -- Greetings, Alex Hermann _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
