Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote: > On Oct 05, 2009 at 17:12, Martin Hoffmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Similarly, fr_timer indicates the time after which resending of a > > 2xx response upstream will cease, if no ACK has been received. > ^^^^ negative response to an invite > > (it has nothing to do with 2xx/ACK which are end-to-end, but with > negative replies replies for INV and ACK)
Er, yes. Of course. > > But if it gets split, rather use nr_inv_timer and fr_inv_timer or > > somesuch, to make it a bit more telling. Or use, what is it? A and C? > > There is not a 1:1 mapping between the RFC timers and the tm timers. > According to the RFC we should use only fr_inv_timer all the time for > INVITEs :-) (so no fast failover, voicemail a.s.o) After reading: Isn't fr_timer corresponding to timer B and fr_inv_timer to C? Which actually would mean that you shouldn't mess with fr_timer and keep it at 32 seconds and are free to mess with fr_inv_timer but make it reasonably big? > See also https://sip-router.org/wiki/ref_manual/timers , which is a more > complete description, including corresponding RFC timer names. See? ;) Regards, Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
