2011/10/10 Henning Westerholt <[email protected]>: >> Some other collateral changes needed for the above to work properly: >> >> - 430 status code MUST have less priority than any other 4XX response >> since such 430 response can only be replied by edge proxies and means >> "the TCP/TLS connection with the user is closed". > > What about the 439 code, i guess we need support in the server for this as > well?
Yes. But IMHO it's not so interesting as it would just occur in case the proxy between client and registrar does not support RFC 5626 (and I suppose that both servers would always be provided and configured by the same admin). -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
