On 11/29/11 9:28 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
29 nov 2011 kl. 18:57 skrev sip-router:

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.

A user has added themself to the list of users assigned to this task.

FS#184 - Crash if t_release() is executed after t_relay_to(), when this last 
returns -1
User who did this - Iñaki Baz Castillo (ibc)
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=184

Now this was caused by bad configuraiton, but if we have had or will have 
crashes based on incoming MI, RPC or SIP messages, we should have a routing for 
how to handle security fixes in Kamailio. When evaluating open source projects 
I always check the security procedures.

Anyone interested in assisting in writing up a document about this we can 
publish on the web site and try to follow if we get such an issue? I think we 
can happily steal from other projects, so it should not be hard work.

Anyone objecting to implementing a process for handling security incidents?
I have no objection in this regard, any contribution/managing process that will make usage of the project easier/more attractive for various people is welcome. The question will be who will take the work (e.g., reviewing, categorization, announcements to devels and community, ...). Personally, I try not to make a difference between bugs, but just try to solve asap, with priority on how common use case is the situation rising the bug.

Another question is categorizing 'security bugs' - in my understanding I consider such bugs when one can gain access to server or steal/compromise data from/on the server. Chasing situations are not in this category (IMO).

Cheers

--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda


_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

Reply via email to