On 06.11.2012 16:38, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2012/11/5 Klaus Darilion <[email protected]>:
Indeed, this is not implemented correctly.
What is not implemented correctly? It MUST be correctly implemented,
what is the exact problem? RFC 3263 is very clear in the steps to
perform (first NAPTR and when not present try SRV in order of
preperence based on local policy).
Could you please describe the exact issue in Kamailio about this?
It is like described in the first email:
Kamailio does the following lookups:
1. NAPTR cisco.com (no result)
2. SRV _sip._udp.cisco.com (NXDOMAIN)
3. A cisco.com -> Bingo -> use SIP over UDP to Cisco's web server :-(
regards
Klaus
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
