2012/12/19 Juha Heinanen <[email protected]>: > ice seems to be at least in theory supported by several sip clients: > baresip, csipsimple, pjsip based clients, etc. > > one of the problems of ice is that is uses turn protocol to find ip > addresses/ports of relays in case end-to-end connectivity cannot be > established otherwise. turn server, on the other hand, must > authenticates its clients. this doubles authentication work and, worse, > a single turn server does not seem to be able to handle more than one > domain. having each domain its own turn server is clearly not a > scalable solution. so life would be easier without turn servers. > > mediaproxy module has solved this problem so that it adds the ice relay > candidates to sdp on behalf of ice clients and therefore no separate > turn servers nor turn client authentication are needed. > > have people who have worked on rtpproxy or mediaproxy-ng considered > supporting ice in the way mediaproxy modules does today? any other > thoughts about this?
I plan to add STUN/TURN directly into erlrtpproxy. And yes, this definitely needs a completely new protocol, JSON-based. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
