Peter Dunkley writes: > I don't understand (functionally) what the difference between a > flow-token in a Path: header and the received parameter is. So I don't > understand why a flow-token can't be put in a Path: header when using > GRUU.
most likely you are correct, i.e., there is no problem with flow token in path header of register request as long as there is a way to avoid flow token in r-r uris. -- juha _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
