THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added:
FS#325 - tm doesn't relay changed 'To' header in CANCEL before dialog is established User who did this - Trip Volpe (tvolpe) ---------- To revisit this issue, I'm wondering why the check in t_cancel.c is necessary at all. If the UAC buffer contains a different to-URI, shouldn't that always be used, especially since the comment above indicates that the CANCEL should be constructed from the INVITE that was *sent out*, not the one that was received? In particular, is there a reason that this patch is not a solution to the problem? https://github.com/mraccident/kamailio/commit/c6d0062aac8c50594abd7b927ad0d44a41abb770 That is, is there a circumstance under which you'd want the received to-URI to override the one in the sent INVITE, in the cases where they differ? ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=325#comment1064 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above. _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
